A review Of Tata Neu .

Tata Neupass under Tata Digital is now over two years old. Because I had Taj Inner Circle, Titan and Tanishq memberships, Tata neu came to me from Day Zero. After two years of holding the app based membership, I feel a review is in order. The legacy memberships, especially inner Circle with its membership card was a joy to hold compared to the present app and phone based loyalty programme. I know it covers any number of brands but Brand Loyalty is to a particular brand and not for the holding company.

It is an all encompassing loyalty programme and the cost of running the NeuPass programme must be enormous but on the evidence of two years, I think the neupass is settling down as a mediocre programme.The chances of personalised targetting becomes difficult when you start making a common platform for Big Basket and IHC hotels. While neupass may add to the glitz for Big Basket customers, Zoya or Taj Safari customers may have different needs.

So at this point Neupass is meandering into the middle overs of an ODI match, whereas it needs the buzz of t20 or sedate uniqueness of a Golf or Test match cricket.

The seeds of the Big Three

 It has been forty years since we won the World Cup. Many things have happened in cricket since.Test match attendance have come down.ODIs blossomed and peaked but have now been over taken by t20.There are players who are free agents not often available for their region or country( think Sunil Narine) but visible almost all year round from Port of Spain to Port Elizabeth.And India has lived up to Ashish Nandy's formulation of cricket being an Indian sport accidently discovered in England.Indian viewership largely runs the sport.And the concept of Big three has evolved who have given new vigour to test match rivalry.All this owes to that win at Lord's and another win in a different format in South Africa in 2007.

India wins cricket itself.

 It has been 40 years since that day Mike Brearly handed over the cup to Kapil Dev.Like the day 1953, when football arguably replaced cricket as Engish papers' favourite sport, this day can be ascribed as the day Indian eyeballs started ruling the cricket world.Though it would be a few years before Dalmia made cricket an Indian enterprise, so much so that I would not be surprised if the Indian viewership of the first Ashes Test outstripped the viewership of SKY, Fox and Kayo put together. 

 For those of who had seen India win only one match in the World Cup( vs East Africa in 1975), the win against the West Indies at Manchester itself was a satisfying outcome in a rain delayed match which ended on the second day not without a late scare caused by Roberts and Garner with 30s each.From then we lived match to match.Drubbing against Australia, a five wicket win against Zimbabwe, who had given us a cushion by defeating Australia in first game defending 239.The second round had that 175 not out at Tunbridge Wells.So exhilarating was the win that we almost returned the favour against Australia at Chelmsford, two days later winning by 118 runs.We bought our chicken that day from a place called Essex farms, even as India was playing at the Essex county ground.We did not think of it that way then but thinking today it looks as if we did it by design.After that we thought the performance was good enough for a team which lost more often than win.The two wins and the cup was as joyous as could be and looking back, a paraphrase of Wordsworth's memory of French revolution looks appropriate: Joy it was on that day to be alive and winning was the very heaven.

175 and all that

The trailer of the film based on the 1983 World Cup rekindles a strong memory in those of us who followed the Indian team which began the World Cup as a 66-1 outsider through an unbelievable two weeks in June 1983. The film obviously is not meant for those of us who followed the World Cup on the radio and the last two matches on the TV as well. The trailer looks like it wants the other half who weren't there to know about the event. Sadly, Yashpal is no more but he was instrumental for the turnaround and may be the weather in the opening match helped us a bit as well as the match went into the second day. Those watching the film will think that there was Hindi commentary on TV. In fact, there was no Hindi commentary on the radio either. For the early matches AIR was not covering the matches ball by ball.

While willing suspension of disbelief is fine, pretending as if the 175 match was on live TV is not quite on. On account of the BBC Outdoor broadcast artists being on strike on 18th June, there was no TV coverage of the matches played on that day. Moreover, with the benefit of hindsight, we know that this would not have been a must win game. The one at Chelmsford vs Australia would have been. And was the 66 run defeat a thrashing? May be. The 162 run one was, of course. All in all for those of us who have been through the 27 matches over two exhilarating weeks, this will be a rewind. Those who haven't lived through first three World Cups will not know what a mélange the World Cup was with four matches per day and to us in India following TMS on the World Service of the BBC or even those in the UK following on Radio 4 were getting only a few overs of a match at a time. Radio Pakistan were probably covering the Pakistan matches but I do not recall if I tried the Medium wave stations as the Short wave coverage was good. Farokh Engineer and Ashish Ray were with the TMS that summer for India's game and what contentment one could feel in their voice even at Manchester when India won only its second World Cup game and possibly only its second ODI in the UK. Ashish Ray and Engineer are still around. It would have been wonderful to have fitted them somewhere if they are not there already.

One day internationals were known to us for sometime but India's record till then was so patchy that All India Radio which covered even Rohinton Baria Trophy live did not deem it fit to broadcast live ODI matches even if it was the World Cup. The early good performance of the Indian team meant that by the second round, Indian matches were available on AIR using the BBC feed. So we knew whenever the Radi 4 and World Service listeners joined the India match. And so it was that the match which in a way brought Zimbabwe a following in India was available to us. From the Nevill Ground in Tunbridge Wells, we had a commentary box which had Asish Ray, Farokh Engineer and the Zimbabwean Bob Nixon along with the regular TMS callers( we did not know the usage then or at least I did not).

The match that we were taking for granted actually came to life even as we were settling in for the afternoon of cricket in a South Delhi neighbourhood. And the rest as they is history.

 T20 is a short format. Therefore, it is hardly surprising that it is seeing a major churn early in its international competitive form. One would think it would be all about hitting but bowlers have done reasonably well. The early stars are fading and people like Kohli and Eoin Morgan are having ordinary tournament.

 Mahesh Pandey had retired as a senior civil servant. He had headed the Administration of his state and over the years had seen the less educated politicians make the better qualified bureaucrats dance to their tune. There were times when Pandeyji felt frustrated and felt that he was wasting his time. The quest of joining civil service and changing his own fate and fate of other deprived people in the most backward of states remained a constant reminder. Not that this quest remained unfulfilled in its entirety. He had usually lived in big houses, drove in decent motor cars and had a retinue of helps at home and underlings in office.

The cricketing Codes Beyond Rules

Ikram Alikhil is young.He has played in the World Cup.He also has played Test cricket.He is a capable batsman and a wicket keeper. Yet aspects of cricket keep unfolding as mysteries being decoded.In Lucknow yesterday, he rushed out to congratulate Rahmat Sah, the batsman on the other end on reaching his half century.A natural response from an excitable young man but the ball was still in play and he was run out.Many years ago in early 1974, Bernard Julien patted down the last ball of the day in a test match and the non striker Alvin Kallicharan walked away only to see Tony Greig fielding at silly point knock down the stumps and appeal for a run out.As stumps had not been called, umpire Douglass Sang Hue gave him out.A furore erupted.What to speak of Alikhil in whose country hardly any cricket was then played, even Shai Hope who claimed the run out may not have heard of the incident. Yet at moments like these there are unwritten codes which as a cricketer you can follow as Walsh did in the 1987 World Cup, Vishwanath followed in the Centenary Test by recalling a batsman and India went on to lose a test but Vishwanath went up several notches in fans' esteem.

India Pakistan rivalry will soon be history like cricket's oldest rivalry.

The followers of cricket in the 70s started the decade with an embargo on cricketing ties with Pakistan.In the interim Pakistan were doing well and playing reasonably well overseas.Indians were excited when cricketing ties were restored.Even then, England and Australian cricketers did not consider India at par and Indian fans were reasonably pleased with series where treatment was at par.Economy in Pakistan was ok and Indians still were pleased to wait 10 years for a scooter.Things changed more after 1991(PVN) and 1996(JMD).Now Pakistan is passed.Australia and India are new marquee teams with significant economy and cricket following which is wide enough to support a competitive bilateral series.Mainly the media tries to revive India Pakistan rivalry but it is even less talked about by young person's as Liverpool vs Tootenham Hotspur.Media Moghuls may like to smell their coffee and not flog a dying horse.

Cricket's oldest rivalry is not Australia vs England but Canada vs USA. However not only is this rivalry dead but cricket has lost any serious importance in North America.So please resist temptation  to think India vs Pakistan is anything special.Every World Cup game is special.Cricket can be uncertain. India does poorly in bilateral series because of various reasons including ennui vs hype in opposition.

For all those like me who were young in 1975, the World Cup was a novelty.India had played not more than two ODIs, which in any case was a new concept at international level.There had been one day tournaments in three formats in England but international One Day matches were few and far between.Amidst this  the Prudential Cup was introduced.

     The Prudential Cup was new even to aficionados who followed test matches around the World.One such introduced me to the World Cup.And India vs England was a classical match which should have been an advertisement for its non popularity.SUNIL Gavaskar remained 36 not out in 60 overs.We were not even sure whether this was good or bad.

Gavaskar and Vishwanath, Tendulkar and Dravid and Hopefully Pujara and Kohli

Nearly three years back, I had wondered who would be our batting mainstays. Virat Kohli, then was already exceptional in ODIs and establishing himself in tests.Pujara was having poor series away from South Asia.Finally, it apperas the duo of Koh;li and Pujara have established themselves and several series win at home and two away have cemented this.

Taking a look at overseas performance of India since1932, two distinct pattern seems to emerge.One between 1971-1982 and one between 1996-2008.During this period while India managed to do well in India, it was competitive abroad winning series in England, West Indies and Pakistan, often for the first time.Both these phases saw India having two very  good batsmen, Gavaskar and Vishwanath in the first phase and Tendulkar and Dravid in the second.There was a decent support cast and good bowlers but the bulwark of two competent world class batsmen kept the team afloat.the decline of the second pair and now lacking any pair with similar capabilities, India finds itself in a situation where overseas visits often end with defeats and inconsistent performance.

There have been away series with bowlers led by Kapil Dev helping India make winning forays, home and away.There have been batsmen like Amarnath, Vengsarkar,Azharuddin and Sehwag who have shone and in Sehwag's case dazzled but the confidence the two pairs brought were unmatched.The present has Kohli, definitely the best ODI batsman today but who else?

Vindicating Fanny Price: Course or College in the University of Delhi

It is that time of the year when thousands of school leavers who have not been swayed by the charms of Engineering, Medicine and Law make their pilgrimages to various colleges of the University of Delhi(DU) to see and to seek and get admission.Over the years, even students of Humanities have a professional option and hundreds opt for 5 year law courses.It can be inferred that the bulk who apply for DU's colleges are interested in pursuing higher education. It is therefore extremely important whether one chooses a college or a course.

Because of various selection criteria and choice of subjects in school students are often confounded by this choice.There would be some students who would and could get any course of their stream and some of others as well.For example a Humanities student with Best Four Subjects (BFS) of 99 with Economics and mathematics amongst them can get admission to any college including Hindu College and LSR who admit on the basis of marks alone for any Arts Honours programme. This student can also get admitted to Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics Honours Courses. Leaving this set, we could have students who because of many combinations get say history in St.Stephen's and Political Science which may have her  first choice in LSR. Or more tantalisingly if it has been his favourite subject and has to make a choice between Hindu and St.Stephen's. 

In these cases the student has to make a choice.If one wants to go for higher studies in the subject or wants to read  Economics, it makes sense to pursue Economics at any Delhi university college where marks can get her/him.What has to be remembered is that unlike the IITs or the National Law Universities, the degree given at the end of three years across colleges is the same and does not have the name of college written on it.As regards faculty, there is hardly any difference. Suvir Kaul is Rosenthal Professor of English at UPenn but taught English for years at Khalsa College.The student pool, residential facilities, discipline levels could be different but the levels of teaching and the course remain the same. even the student pool has been narrowed down thanks to CBSE's evaluation standards. Thirty five years back, the cut off for English Honours in St.Stephen's and Hindu Colleges were 70% with Elective English and at KM College it was 65%.The five percent differential was quite a bit.Even that has narrowed down now., though it did not make much difference even then as university toppers could be from any where and were from any college.For the mentioned class of 1983, English Honours, it was a student of LSR who topped the university and she went on to become a scholar in Sociology and not English. Amitav Ghosh had read History in college and moved to Sociology, a few years earlier.

So the college or course debate is not as open and shut as one can imagine.It is possible to change discipline  in a related or inter-disciplinary area.Another fact that should be important while chosing a course is aptitude.Since most schools do not have counsellors and Delhi University do not have any aptitude Test, students may end up doing a course which they do not like because of the trend or informal pecking order.Most schools do not offer a choice of Elective english and CBSE does not permit the students to offer English as an elective as in the past. Several schools teach the CBSE Communicative English in Class ten and not English language and literature. This means that if you are interested in doing English Honours, you have to do a lot of reading on the side. The easiest way to set out is that in the Vacations after Class ten or even twelve, one can read all the set texts of ISC Class XI-XII Literature in English/Elective English.While the number of books are fewer than before, there is still a wide variety. The ten books prescribed  can be read over two weeks and after that one can graduate to reading thirty odd books more depending on whether Arthur Miller or Amitav Ghosh or Kiran Desai interested one more. Even after all this, Vindicating fanny Price or any Jane Austen character that the tutor may set for the first tutorial may be akin to the high flying Afghanistan team from T20s facing India in a test match.But the teachers will take care  over the next three years.But the basic readiness to read and to write  has to be there.Just like cricket is about bat and ball, a course in English is about reading and writing.There will be gender studies, new criticism or even post-modernism  a little later which English honours will  gently introduce over the years.

Then,  there is a small matter of after college job opportunities.Here there are a few colleges which have more placement opportunities.Even certain courses have possibilities of placement after college more than others.A careful look at precedents and preferences can be found out.this is generally not available in the public domain but available in detail in DU folklore.interaction with school contemporaries or neighbourhood friends at or recently out of DU can be a good source for these inputs.

After balancing all probabilities, a student can with perhaps a little nudge from parents arrive at a satisfactory choice of college and a subject for college.

Quack and the BCG

In today's Indian Express(06.10.2017), Janmejaya Sinha who has been described as Chairman, Asia Pacific, Boston Consulting Group.  has in an edit page  article: "India needs a new IAS "(Indian Express, 6.10.2017) outlined a case for a more effective bureaucracy in an "

 increasingly specialised, complex and changing world." He has offered a prescription of recommendations without checking on his facts or adequate research.The Civil services Examination he is describing has changed in content in the last few years.The subject component is less than a fifth in weightage. at present.The Civil Services examination for some years now  has moved away from two optional and one General Studies Paper (and at least for 35 years there has been no General Knowledge paper) to one subject based optional, an essay and several common papers. Some of his comments  do appear relevant but in the absence of any evidence of serious subject knowledge, his prescription can be likened to that of a quack who also gets some of his diagnosis right.This is symptomatic of the consulting industry at least in India.Young rookies just out of college hold forth on every subject under the sun without checking on facts.In literary criticism, future scholars are told to stick to facts, so much so that if an author says something which the text does not, the text will be sacred.

One wishes it is is the same in consulting.Otherwise even correct recommendations may appear frivolous and less authentic as the homework has not been done properly.Obviously, things have changed from Janmejaya Sinha's time when his contemporaries at Delhi's St.Stephen's College  would have beenn writing the Civil Services examination.Moreover, Sinha has kept silent on the performance of so called specialists in Governments in the Central services from the IFS to various other Accounts and Finance and Revenue Services where over the years the officers have earned domain and subject specialisations. Most of the officers are no more a specialist in their subjects as Sinha is a historian.After an Honours in history, if he can become an economist, others in the Government come from diverse areas and become experts.However, are they able to perform at expected levels?It would be pertinent to point out that the edit page ediors at the Indian Express did not bother to edit factual inaccuracies in their lead article or the superficial nature of the Consultant's examination would have  not been  noticed by the readers.

Cricket from Near and Far

To some of us who have grown up watching or playing cricket in school grounds and following international bilateral cricket throughout the year, new concepts like t20 and various leagues are parts of life today. Like Mobile phones and colour TV,PCs and the World Wide Web, these are something which we have seen spread. So while there is no denying that while an inter College two innings game could get upwards of 20000 people to watch in the 1970s Delhi, today it is IPL which brings in the thousands. Yet, the bilateral series are very easy to follow today on mediums unknown in the 1970s. Satellite TV and internet Radio have replaced Shortwave Radio as the means of tuning into live matches. Radio Australia, BBC World Service airing TMS and radio Pakistan commentary were usually available on short wave radio. All India Radio had plenty of local matches. Just like old days when you could serendipitously discover a Ranji Match being broadcast around the country sometimes in languages you don’t completely follow, in between Bangladesh-SriLanka t20 while surfing channels, I found an IPL match with Telegu commentary (the commentator was Venugopal Rao, so I assume it was Telgu).

The high point of this off season in India of course is the series between the West Indies and Pakistan in North America. The matches would be aired on TV and there is enough radio commentary available though not on Medium Wave Radio from Radio Pakistan which incidentally was our only way to follow the initial matches of the World Championship of cricket in 1985.One day cricket was held in so low esteem, even after two years of India having won the World Cup that this multilateral even was not broadcast on All India Radio till India started creating gigantic waves. The ABC commentary was then broadcast like the BBC commentary was broadcast during the World Cup in 1983 after a few matches. Semi finals and the final were shown on Doordarshan and we got to see Channel 9 coverage for the first time. From there, it has been a different journey for those who follow cricket from India.

There is live cricket being broadcast across formats involving any number of teams in India. This winter, we got to see a riveting one day series between Afghanistan and Ireland .However, the various test series in New Zealand were not shown on TV in India. Radio Sport was sporting enough not to geoblock us and we were able to tune in to some good cricket broadcast passionately.

Before I conclude,I would point out that the absence of  ball by ball  coverage of the so called  Home season in India on AIR really rankled.All India Radio has been the home of cricket in India and I would have loved to have heard, on medium wave, short wave, FM,laptops and notebooks, This is the AIR’s Home of Cricket. Alas, it was not so.

Towards Tolerance: A literary Peak into the Past

Intolerance is not a new issue in our country.The Illutrated weekly of India, once had an article by Arun Shourie(?), in which he categorised hate and jealousy as national pastime.I hope he has not taken to it.The following poem shows how troubled a legacy we have had.

The Ambiguous Fate of Gieve Patel, He Being Neither Muslim Nor Hindu in India

"To be no part of this hate is deprivation.
Never could I claim a circumcised butcher
Mangled a child out of my arms, never rave
At the milk-bibing, grass-guzzing hypocrite
Who pulled off my mother's voluminous
Robes and sliced away at her dugs.
Planets focus their fires
Into a worm of destruction
Edging along the continent. Bodies
Turn ashen and shrivel. I
Only burn my tail"-Gieve Patel

A Lopsided Closely Contested Series

A Test Match result is best understood as a part of the series result.The recent Ashes had at least four one sided result and one test match was won by England with a significant margin.However, the series result at 3-2 made for a closely contested series in that the series went to the last test match to decide the winner.In most other sport a close contest is within the period of the match, say 60-70 minutes in Hockey or 90 minutes in football.A one way win makes the match boring except for the devoted partisan supporters.In cricket, the series provides a greater  context and there are test points and records which keep even the neutral fans interested. A tennis five setter, is the nearest parallel, at least in the cricket following world.At times, players conserve energy in sets they know that can't be retrieved to bounce back in the next set.A five setter between Roscoe Tanner and Borg in 1979 Wimbledon finals was close and interesting, even though a few sets were not so closely fought.

The context adds to the rivalry in cricket and Tennis and even one sided contests can be enjoyed, over an evening in tennis or a wole month and a half in cricket.

Different Captains across formats

Over the past several years, we have seen a test match captain handing over reign during ODIs.It started with Taylor and Waugh,continued with Waugh and Ponting and has almost been institutionalised in Australia.Several other teams have followed it even when the ODI captain remains in the Test side.However from Jason Holder to AB Devilliers,their aim remains to become even greater Test performers and in Holder's case lead the Test side.The entire mindset seems that you graduate to Tests and settle down there.Except in India.While even the West Indies have a plan for Tests, the BCCI has no concern that their team,often ours as well, do not figure in Test cricket's elite.Even home performances against top teams need to show consistency.Under such circumstances,we have a Test in Bangladesh in what is definitely not cricket weather.It would have done us good to organise a Test with Bangladesh in Dharmashala and play a five ODI series in Fatullah and Mirpur.

Gavaskar&Vishwanath, Tendulkar & Dravid, Who next?

Taking a look at overseas performance of India since1932, two distinct pattern seems to emerge.One between 1971-1982 and one between 1996-2008.During this period while India managed to do well in India, it was competitive abroad winning series in England, West Indies and Pakistan, often for the first time.Both these phases saw India having two very  good batsmen, Gavaskar and Vishwanath in the first phase and Tendulkar and Dravid in the second.There was a decent support cast and good bowlers but the bulwark of two competent world class batsmen kept the team afloat.the decline of the second pair and now lacking any pair with similar capabilities, India finds itself in a situation where overseas visits often end with defeats and inconsistent performance.

There have been away series with bowlers led by Kapil Dev helping India make winning forays, home and away.There have been batsmen like Amarnath, Vengsarkar,Azharuddin and Sehwag who have shone and in Sehwag's case dazzled but the confidence the two pairs brought were unmatched.The present has Kohli, definitely the best ODI batsman today but who else?

India's World Cup

The World Cup presents the Indian Cricket team with an opportunity to outshine the rest in a few weeks and drown out there tales of woes of the past year and "Turn(ing) all (your) sad sounds around

 When you sing “Hey, nonny nonny” instead." That is what they have been doing for the last two Sundays.India have it in them to defend their title, their recent form notwithstanding.The indian cricket team winning abroad in 2015 will not solve long time problems but give ideas to the ICC. what about a world Cup in the West indies with all of India's matches in the USA.What kind of crowd can you expect?And a sustained six weeks of cricket could change the scene in the USA where weather in large parts are conducive to cricket.

Reflections on popular Fiction

Q: How is your writing different from, say, a Jhumpa Lahiri, a Neel Mukherjee or a Jeet Thayil?A: I think we are writing for different people. We may be writing about the same things, which is India. And we may all be Indian. But I think they are writing for a different audience. I am writing for a different audience. People say they are very good writers. Much better than me. So maybe that is the case. I don’t know.(from Book talk: an interview by Ankush Arora  http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2014/10/10/chetan-bhagat-half-girlfriend/).

This is how Chetan Bhagat differentiates his writing from that of contemporaries like Jhumpa Lahiri and Neel Mukherjee.But as a reader who finds books by both Bhagat and these authors referred to at the same place, be it on Flipkart or amazon or at the bookstore at the neighbourhood mall, I really feel let down by Chetan Bhagat. I bought novels by both Chetan Bhagat and Neel Mukherjee last month and read them in the same week.

Q: We have an India-origin author once again in the race for the Booker Prize. Have you read Neel Mukherjee?A: No, I am dying to read it. Listen, these are brilliant authors. I write for very different reasons. I want every Indian to pick up an English book. Every slum girl or kid to pick up an English book. And for that I have to write a certain kind of a book.
That is what Bhagat thinks but behind every writer the inherent desire is to be read by a large audience.Dickens and George Eliot were best sellers and so are Rushdie and Coetzee. Actually Bhagat is insulting the intellect of his readers when he says he is writing for a particular set.Just like a driving license, reading ability comes at a certain level.If you can read Chetan Bhagat, you can read Neel Mukherjee as well. At least Mukherjee gets his Calcutta and Midnapore right and writes a credible story where you wait with anticipation for the turn of events more so than in Bhagat.And just as when one learns to drive in a city, she can gradually take to the highways, so too can the reader growing up on CBSE English Core and communiccative English learn to enjoy so called serious fiction.

Random Jottings after reading Neel Mukherjee and Chetan Bhagat in the same Week.

"...a cloudy suspension in all that clear amazement and disbelief that could only be called envy as if a fellow prisoner had been released and he left behind to serve his sentence." this is a part of a sentence from Neel Mukherjee's The Lives of Others( London: Chatto and Windus,2014), chosen at random. To the readers who are familiar with the phrase "willing suspension of disbelief" coined in 1817 by Coleridge it will perhaps suggest that the writer read English while at the University.Even a trained reader has to carefully interpret what the writer has written.When compared to the writings of a close contemporary also writing in English, Chetan Bhagat, one wonders who these writers are writing for. Chetan Bhagat, perhaps has even this group of liberal arts graduates as his readers in mind but Neel Mukherjee?

While this question would require a longer study, the fact that Chetan Bhagat in his extra literary pursuit talks about the serious writers, the lit crits and so on means that he is also concerned about a group of people who while some were trying to get into an IIT were reading a book a week, often more and talking about them.This group has always been there. From Ravi Babu with his zemindari to Amitav Ghose with his day job.Even Chetan Bhagat started as an investment banker. If Neel Mukherjee went to Don Bosco School and Jadavpur followed by both Oxford and Cambridge, Bhagat went to an IIT followed by IIM and lived in HongKong and Singapore.So what essentially makes one different from the other?There have been writers like Saul Bellow who have studied engineering but have written what is taken as serious fiction. There have also been writers like Dan Brown and John Grisham who while professionally trained have written for a larger popular audience.

Yet, when one reads Chetan Bhagat and Neel Mukherjee in the same week, one realises how much liberty Bhagat takes with facts and the use of a language.While he is writing fiction, facts in his fiction often far from actual facts.  Harbhajan Singh gets his hattrick in the wrong innings, Sociology is taught at St.Stephen's College, the Dumraon Royals are shown as having a Maithil Brahmin surname and so on. The lack of research and not getting facts right  are perhaps what make the lit crit unhappy with Chetan Bhagat but also restricts his readership if not in serious numbers, then definitely in its width among those who have grown reading books, Harry Potter to Dan Brown and on to Rushdie and Coetzee.